Johanna Silva vs Madelief Hageman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Aug at 11:08 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Silva vs M. Hageman

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Silva 1 - 0 Hageman
They have played 3 sets in total, with Johanna Silva winning 2 and Madelief Hageman winning 1. The last match between Johanna Silva and Madelief Hageman was at the W15 Savitaipale, 01-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Johanna Silva getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Silva | 1 |
| Hageman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Savitaipale(08-01-25)
J. Silva vs M. Hageman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 68.14% (77-36) | Career Total W/L | 50.37% (137-135) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Silva vs M. Hageman Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance compare? Hageman recently won 39.9% of second serve points, slightly lower than Silva's 40.7%.
- In terms of return stats, Hageman has dominated 47.13% of opponents' second serve points compared to Silva's noteworthy 62.14%.
- For first serve returns, Hageman claims 37.98%, slightly above Silva's 36.07%.
- Under pressure, Hageman saves 46.87% of breakpoints, significantly more than Silva's 29.63%.
- Considering their match success rate over the past year, Silva triumphs in 56.25% of matches, while Hageman's win rate is lower at 49.15%.
- On clay, Silva has an impressive winning rate of 73%, eclipsing Hageman's 52% on the same surface. On hard surfaces, Silva excels with a 64% win rate, a stark contrast to Hageman's 37%.
- When looking at the level of play, Silva comes out top, winning 60% of matches in $10K tournaments, whereas Hageman's win rate sits at 46.67%.
- Hageman faces opponents with an average ranking of 358.69, while Silva challenges tougher opponents with an average ranking of 90.5.
- If it comes to a deciding set, Hageman wins 50% of the time, but Silva boasts a flawless 100% success rate.
- In converting break points, Hageman converts 41.41% of opportunities, surpassing Silva's 34.15% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (August 1, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Hageman and Silva promises a fascinating contest. With a slight edge in second serve performance, Silva might appear to have an early advantage.
However, the standout statistic is Silva's exceptional 62.14% win rate on returning opponents' second serves, indicating strong defensive skills critical for turning matches.
Although Hageman can handle pressure well, converting a higher percentage of break points, Silva's record of saving 100% in deciding sets suggests an unparalleled nerve in crucial moments.
Factoring in surface preference, Silva's dominance on clay surfaces gives them a critical advantage, supported by facing stronger opponents historically and consistently excelling in key matches.
All considered, Silva appears to be the more likely winner in the upcoming match, given the significant numerical and historical advantages.
Johanna Silva vs Madelief Hageman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Silva vs M. Hageman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:42:26 | Average Match Time | 2:42:26 |
| 70% (64/91) | 1st Serve % | 71% (61/86) |
| 53% (34/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (25/61) |
| 37% (10/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 67% (10/15) | Break Pts Won % | 80% (8/10) |
| 59% (51/86) | Return Points Win % | 52% (47/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Silva Recent Matches Played
M. Hageman Recent Matches Played

J. Silva vs M. Hageman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.14% (77/36) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.37% (137/135) |
| 61.81% (157/97) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.68% (311/315) |
| 55.59% (1283/1025) | Games Win/Loss | 51.28% (2976/2827) |
| 64.29% (18/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (14/21) |
| 70.42% (50/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.74% (119/111) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 185 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 210 | Total Double Faults | 557 |
| 1:14:51 | Average Match Time | 1:20:49 |
| 320.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 101.26 |
| 69% (3541/5163) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8766/13465) |
| 57% (2014/3541) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4983/8766) |
| 42% (680/1622) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2067/4699) |
| 47% (373/786) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (864/1760) |
| 50% (2554/5144) | Return Points Win % | 47% (6283/13283) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Challenger W/L | 38.46% (15/24) |
| 71.43% (60/24) | Futures W/L | 52.36% (122/111) |
| 68% (76/112) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (136/271) |
| 69% (11/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (9/45) |
| 86% (25/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (45/83) |
| 95% (65/62) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (133/114) |
| 5% (65/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (133/19) |
| 31% (48/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (139/23) |